Close with numbers your finance team can defend.
Last reviewed·ReconPe Editorial
ReconPe FinanceOps brings reconciliation, approvals, close controls, and CFO reporting into one period workspace. It does not replace your ERP. It replaces the spreadsheet operating layer that sits between your ERP, bank files, and month-end sign-off.
Month-end, reviewed in an afternoon — not rebuilt over three weeks.
AI does the first pass on every tie-out and drafts the entries. You approve everything that moves the books.
Rule sets, journal entries, accruals and CoA imports in one inbox — each row inspectable before you approve.
AP & AR chains tie document → payment → bank. Catches duplicate vendor payments and drafts AR collection chase-ups you send.
Prepaid amortization and accrual / GRNI drafts generated as journal entries — the books are prepped before you reconcile them.
Auto-open day one, recurring JEs, and triage autopilot proposing bulk break actions for one-click approval.
The close is not just matching. It is readiness, judgment, and evidence.
Finance leaders do not need another grid of unmatched rows. They need to know which accounts are clean, what moved, who owns the blockers, and what can be sent to reviewers.
Know what moved
Budget-vs-actual flux names the accounts that moved and the open breaks driving them, so the CFO review starts with the variance that matters.
Know what is safe
Certification readiness separates machine-verified clean control accounts from accounts that need review, with one reason per exception.
Know what to send
The CFO close pack turns the live close into a print-ready summary: tie-out status, blockers, judgments, sign-offs, and what remains open.
A close operating surface, not a single-purpose matcher.
Subset-sum remains the sharp wedge, but the product now covers the work around the match: ownership, approvals, recurring entries, CoA governance, settlement tracking, evidence, and CFO communication.
One period workspace for every tie-out
AR-to-GL, AP-to-GL, bank-to-GL, intercompany, fixed assets, and inventory runs now converge into the cockpit. Domain filters keep the detail accessible without splitting the close into six separate tools.
AI proposes. Finance approves.
Rule sets, journal entries, variance commentary, and Chart of Accounts imports land in one approval inbox. Reviewers can inspect the proposal before approving or rejecting it.
The close follows your Chart of Accounts
Stage a CoA import, approve it, edit accounts, deactivate stale codes, and keep the account audit trail visible. Recode and JE proposals are governed by the accounts finance actually owns.
The month starts on rails
Auto-open a period, seed the run-sheet, track checklist completion, and generate recurring journal entries into approvals. Nothing closes itself; the repetitive setup stops waiting for a person.
Prepare the books before reconciling them
Prepaids generate amortization JEs from schedules. Accruals draft GRNI / received-not-invoiced entries from open breaks. Both land in approvals instead of bypassing control.
Track AP and AR settlement chains
Settlement chains connect source document, payment leg, and bank leg so finance can see what is paid, what cleared, and what still needs collection or investigation.
Catch what did not happen
The close usually breaks on the entry nobody booked and the feed that never arrived. Completeness detection flags a vendor that billed for months then went quiet, with a run-rate estimate of the likely-missing accrual. Source-freshness tracks whether every required file has actually landed before you call the period ready. Both are advisory: they surface the gap, a person decides.
Proven entries can post themselves, gated
Once a human has approved a recurring journal entry cleanly enough times, you can opt it into auto-approve under a materiality cap. It stays gated by a deterministic proof, a maturity check, and a re-attestation cadence; every auto-posted entry is fully audited and one-click reversible before it reaches the ledger. Autonomy is earned per pattern and revocable in one click, never applied to the whole close and never to the money math.
Advise a whole book at once
For fractional CFOs and accounting firms: see every client's close in one console, and ask across your book in plain language, which client has the worst receivables aging, who is behind on collections, how the close is tracking. Each answer is grounded in that client's own numbers, read-only, and scoped to the clients a platform admin has granted you.
The cockpit keeps the accountant in control.
Every smart action is designed to land in a reviewable state. That is the line: automation for repetitive analysis, human accountability for accounting decisions.
Sub-ledger to GL matching
Subset-sum and many-to-one matching still handle the hard reconciliation problem: one GL entry, many invoices or bills, date windows, currency, counterparty, residuals.
Cutoff checks
Period-boundary candidates are called out instead of buried as ordinary breaks, with a path to convert the candidate when the source feed catches up.
Roll-forward and tie-out
Control accounts can be reviewed against opening balance, period activity, closing balance, sub-ledger, and reconciling items.
Variance and flux
Month-over-month variance, balance-level flux, and budget-vs-actual views help finance leaders see where the close needs attention.
Journal-entry workflow
Break JEs, recurring entries, prepaid amortization, accruals, and FX revaluation proposals are reviewed before they hit the books.
Sign-off and lifecycle
Preparer, reviewer, and approver sign-offs sit beside soft close, hard close, reopen reasons, and lifecycle history.
AI does the first pass. Finance owns the decision.
This language matters for CFOs and auditors. The product is built around reviewable proposals, not invisible automation.
12 AR invoices, summed to one GL journal entry — in seconds, within tolerance.
- 1
Start the period
Open or auto-open the close package, seed the checklist, and create the runs that matter for the entity.
- 2
Match and classify
ACRE handles exact, fuzzy, and aggregation matching while the cockpit classifies breaks by bucket, cause, owner, age, and blocker status.
- 3
Draft controlled actions
Triage plans, JEs, accruals, prepaids, variance narratives, and CoA imports are proposed into reviewable queues.
- 4
Review, sign, export
Finance approves, signs off, exports the evidence packet or Tally XML, and produces the CFO pack for the people who need the summary.
Different leaders, same close record.
The same workspace supports the person who has to fix the break, the person who signs the close, and the person who explains the month to leadership.
Board review without the scavenger hunt
See tie-out status, open blockers, material flux, budget variance, sign-off state, and the CFO pack from the same operating layer.
A close cockpit instead of a folder tree
Run reconciliations, assign breaks, review JEs, prove tie-outs, and close the period without reconstructing what happened from email threads.
Queues your team can actually manage
Owner inboxes, triage autopilot, aging, materiality, and checklist tasks turn the close from a status meeting into a managed queue.
A client view with trust signals
Advisor access gives a read-only cross-client console for financial health, close readiness, blockers, and working-capital signals.
Data comes in. The close happens. Approved entries flow back.
FinanceOps sits on top of the books you already keep. Pull extracts and bank files in, run the close in the cockpit, then push approved journal entries back to your accounting system.
Bring the period in
Extracts and bank files from whatever system holds the books.
- NetSuiteconnector buildingIntegration
- QuickBooksconnector buildingIntegration
- Zoho Booksconnector buildingIntegration
- Tally exportsledger / day-bookLive today
- Bank statementstemplated shapesLive today
- CSV · Excel · JSON · XMLany systemLive today
Reconcile, approve, certify
The work spreadsheets can't hold: matching, ownership, controlled approvals, and machine-verified readiness in one period workspace.
Send the result back
Approved journal entries and close evidence, ready for the system of record.
- Approved JEs as Tally XMLready nowExport · live
- NetSuiteJE write-backIntegration
- QuickBooksJE write-backIntegration
- Zoho BooksJE write-backIntegration
- Evidence packet · CFO packworkpaper exportLive today
Items marked Live today and Export · live ship now. Items marked Integration are connections we are building for NetSuite, QuickBooks, and Zoho. Everything else runs on the file extracts you already export.
Reviewer-ready outputs without pretending the audit is automatic.
FinanceOps helps your team assemble the record: what matched, what changed, who approved, what remains open, and which entries should move back into accounting.
Evidence packet
A period-level workbook preview/download gathers roll-forward, tie-out, variance, sign-off, and break context for review.
CFO close pack
A print-friendly one-pager summarizes the period for CFO, board, or operating review without pretending to be a statutory filing.
Audit trail and lifecycle
Approvals, break actions, close transitions, reopen reasons, and CoA changes are attributed and visible for later review.
Tally XML exports
Approved JE proposals and close-package entries can be exported as Tally XML where that is the team's accounting workflow.
No magic-close claims. No ERP fantasy.
The best marketing for finance leaders is specificity. Here is what we will not overclaim.
- ReconPe is not your ERP. It runs on the extracts and bank files you already export today, exports approved entries back as Tally XML, and direct integrations with NetSuite, QuickBooks, and Zoho are on the way.
- AI does not silently close the books. It drafts, explains, routes, and proposes; humans approve the actions that change state.
- Auto-approve is earned, not default. A recurring entry only posts itself after a human has approved it cleanly enough times, under a materiality cap, fully audited and reversible. It is never applied to a novel, material, or unproven entry, and never to the money math.
- The cockpit is strongest when the finance team has a real Chart of Accounts and clear owner roles. It is not a shortcut around governance.
- The first deployment should start with two or three painful close domains, then expand once the evidence and ownership model are proven.
Start with the close your team already trusts.
The first week should not be a transformation programme. Replay the last closed period, compare the tie-out, review the exceptions, and decide where the cockpit saves real controller time.
Priced around the entity that closes, not the number of times it reconciles.
Finance teams need predictable cost before they add another close tool. The FinanceOps model stays anchored to legal entities and recurring close work.
Built for controllers who run the same close every month. See the pricing page for tier limits, free wedge details, and marketplace-plan separation.
View FinanceOps pricingPer legal entity, not per reconciliation run
Designed for recurring monthly close work
Includes the close cockpit, approvals, evidence, and FinanceOps modules by tier
Marketplace reconciliation plans remain separate where the operating surface is different
Questions finance leaders ask before they trust a close tool.
Is FinanceOps still mainly AR-to-GL subset-sum matching?
No. AR-to-GL remains the wedge because it is easy to understand and painful in spreadsheets, but the product now covers a broader close cockpit: AP-to-GL, bank-to-GL, intercompany, fixed assets, inventory, approvals, CoA governance, subledger prep, settlement chains, budget flux, and CFO reporting.
Does the AI close the books automatically?
No. The operating model is deliberately controlled: AI proposes, finance approves. Triage plans, journal entries, recurring entries, accruals, variance commentary, and CoA imports all require human review before they change the close state.
Is FinanceOps related to cloud FinOps?
No — the name collision is unfortunate. 'FinOps' in the cloud world means managing AWS/GCP/Azure spend, an engineering practice. ReconPe FinanceOps is finance operations: the month-end close, sub-ledger-to-GL reconciliation, journal-entry workflow, and sign-off. If you're new to the accounting-side discipline, start with our plain-language guide: What is finance ops?
How does this fit with Tally, Zoho, NetSuite, SAP, or bank files?
We are building direct integrations with NetSuite, QuickBooks, and Zoho so the close can pull data and write approved journal entries back without a manual hop. Today, the close already runs on what you export: CSV, Excel, JSON, and XML extracts with templates for common ERP and bank-statement shapes, plus Tally day-book and ledger exports. Approved journal entries flow back out as Tally XML now. For SAP and other systems we do not advertise a live connector — you reconcile from the extract until the integration exists.
What will a CFO actually look at?
CFOs usually care about readiness, material movement, open blockers, and the story behind variances. FinanceOps exposes that through certification readiness, budget-vs-actual flux, balance flux, sign-off state, lifecycle history, and the CFO close pack.
What evidence can we give auditors or reviewers?
The cockpit supports evidence packet workbook export, break-level evidence files, approval trails, sign-off records, lifecycle history, and Tally XML exports for journal entries. It is built to make review easier, not to replace the judgment of your auditor.
Where should we start?
Start with the domains that burn the most time in your current close: AR-to-GL, AP-to-GL, bank-to-GL, or settlement chains. Once ownership and approval flow are working, add CoA governance, recurring JEs, prepaids, accruals, and CFO reporting.
Subset-sum: matching ₹25 lakh to twelve invoices
The GL posts one ₹25,00,000 journal entry. The AR aging has twelve open invoices for that customer. Which subset matches? Humans give up at n=8. Riya walks through the deterministic answer.
Bring the close out of the spreadsheet shadow.
Start with one painful period, one entity, and the files your team already exports. If the cockpit does not make the close easier to review, it has not earned the next domain.